Analysis earning management, good corporate governance, on sticky cost behavior through the policy tax incentives

Authors

  • Jefrianus Jehadu STIE YAPAN Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Aloisius Hama STIE YAPAN Surabaya, Indonesia

Keywords:

Earning management, Good Corporate Governance, Sticky Cost, Tax Incentive Policy

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to test empirically the effect of Earning management, Good Corporate Governance, on sticky cost behavior through a tax incentive policy. The type of data used for sampling is purposive sampling and hypothesis testing using the Partial Least Square (PLS) analysis model with the help of SmartPLS version 3.0 for windows software. The results of this study are; Earning management has contributed to Sticky Cost Behavior. Good Corporate Governance has contributed to Sticky Cost Behavior. Tax incentive policies are not proven as a moderating variable in the influence of Earning management target Sticky Cost. _ The tax incentive policy is proven to be a moderating variable in influence Good Corporate Governance Against Sticky Cost Behavior.

References

Afiffah, A., Murdayanti, Y., Purwohedi, U., & Jakarta, U. N. (2018). Fenomena Perilaku Sticky Cost. Ejournal Ukrida, 18(1), 141–152.
Agustina, D., & Suhaidar. (2020). Pengaruh Love of Money dan Kecerdasan Sosial terhadap Sikap Mahasiswa Akuntansi di Universitas Bangka Belitung. Valid Jurnal Ilmiah, 17(2), 138–150.
Apriliawati, R., & Nugrahanti, Y. W. (2015). Perilaku Sticky Cost Pada Biaya Penjualan, Administrasi Dan Umum (Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2009-2012). Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 5(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v5i2.7866
Haga, J., Höglund, H., & Sundvik, D. (2019). Cost behavior around corporate tax rate cuts. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 34(March), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2019.01.001
Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2013). Do Earnings Targets and Managerial Incentives Affect Sticky Costs? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00471.x
Kang, G. G., Liu, X., Orenstein, P., Ladik, D., Industri, P., Terdaftar, Y., & Amman, S. (2016). Penentuan Perilaku Biaya Lengket di Yordania. 23(April), 63–81.
Kartikasari, R., Suzan, L., & Muslih, M. (2018). Perilaku Sticky Cost Terhadap Biaya Tenaga Kerja Dan Beban Usaha Pada Aktivitas Penjualan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 10(1), 1–7.
Kementrian Keuangan. (2012). Laporan Tim Kajian Profil Sektor Riil : Sektor Perdagangan, Hotel, dan Restoran. Kementrian Keuangan Republik Indonesia Badan Pemberian Fiskal Pusat Pemberian Ekonomi Makro.
Kumalah, Ratih., & Junaidi, A. (2020). Strategi Bisnis Dan Pemanfaatan Pemberian Pajak Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Dan Era New Normal (Studi Kasus Pelaku UKM Marketplace). Prosiding Seminar Stiami Volume 7, No. 2, Oktober 2020, 7(1), 55.
Larastomo, J., Perdana, H. D., Triatmoko, H., & Sudaryono, E. A. (2016). Pengaruh Good governance dan Penghindaran Pajak Terhadap Earning Management Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia. Esensi, 6(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.15408/ess.v6i1.3121
Li, J., & Luo, Z. (2020). The impact of product market competition on stock price crash risk. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 35(7), 1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2018-0375
Linggardjaja, I. K. (2020). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Cost Stickiness : Suatu Kajian Pustaka. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, Dan Akuntansi), 4(1), 52–65.
Lung Li, W., & Zheng, K. (2020). Product Market Competition and Cost Stickiness Wu-Lung. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Noviastika F, D., Mayowan, Y., & Karjo, S. (2016). Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Studi Pada Bursa Efek Indonesia Yang Berkaitan Dengan Perusahaan Asing). Jurnal Perpajakan (JEJAK)|, 8(1), 1–9.
Nugroho, A. C., & Stoffers, J. (2020). Market Competition and Agency Problem: a Study in Indonesian Manufacturing Companies. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 11(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v11i1.21684
Oktaviantari, N. K. A., & Baskara, I. G. K. (2019). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Tangibility Assets, Dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Terhadap Struktur Modal Pada Sub Sektor Ritel. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 8(6), 3843. https://doi.org/10.24843/ejmunud.2019.v08.i06.p20
Pratama, R. S. (2020). Pengaruh product market competition, hedging, research and development, dan marketing terhadap nilai perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur …. Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/51470
Ratnawati, L., & Nugrahanti, Y. W. (2016). Perilaku Sticky Cost Biaya Penjualan, Biaya Administrasi dan Umum Serta Harga Pokok Penjualan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 18(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v18i2.314
Safrina, N., Soehartono, A., & Savitri, A. A. (2020). “Menjaga Marwah” Insentif Perpajakan yang Berdampak pada Penerimaan Pajak di Indonesia Tahun 2019. Jurnal Riset Terapan Akuntansi, 4(1), 1–11.
Santosa, D. F., Anggraeni, L., & Pranowo, K. (2020). Determinan Financial Distress Perusahaan Subsektor Ritel Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 6(1), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.6.1.128
Slamet, A., & Wijayanti, P. (2016). Respon Perubahan Tarif Pajak Penghasilan, Insentif Dan Non-Insentif Pajak Terhadap Earning Management. Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 5(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.30659/jai.5.2.115-130
Soenjoto, E. A., & Alfiandri, A. (2019). The Asymmetrical Cost Behavior: Cost Stickiness in Indonesian Listed Manufacturing Companies. International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 7(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijat.v7n1a3
Vonna, S. R., & Daud, R. M. (2016). Analisis Perilaku Sticky Cost pada Biaya Produksi dan Non-produksi (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2011-2014 ). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 1(1), 120–132.
Warsito, & Samputra, P. L. (2020). POTENSI PENURUNAN PAJAK DAN STRATEGI PEMBERIAN PAJAK UNTUK MENGANTISIPASI DAMPAK PANDEMI COVID-19 : PERSPEKTIF KETAHANAN NASIONAL ( Potensial of Tax Declining and Tax Policy Strategy to Anticipate the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic : A National Resilienc. 11(2), 93–108.
Winasis, S. E., Nur, E., & Yuyetta, A. (2017). Pengaruh Gender Diversity Eksekutif Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan, Tax Avoidance Sebagai Variabel Intervening : Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Tahun 2012-2015. 6(1), 311–324.
Xue, S., & Hong, Y. (2016). Earning management, Good Corporate Governance and expense stickiness. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2015.02.001
Yang, Y. (2019). Do Accruals Earning management Constraints and Intellectual Capital Efficiency Trigger Asymmetric Cost Behaviour? Evidence from Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 29(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12250

Downloads

Published

2023-07-08

How to Cite

Jehadu, J. ., & Hama, A. . (2023). Analysis earning management, good corporate governance, on sticky cost behavior through the policy tax incentives. Journal of Management Science (JMAS), 6(3), 275–280. Retrieved from https://exsys.iocspublisher.org/index.php/JMAS/article/view/236